3 Comments
User's avatar
Dave's avatar

I must respectfully disagree with one assertion that you make in this review, which is that the MCU has set a standard that all magic is just sufficiently advanced technology. There is no technology involved when, in Ragnarok (terrible a film as it was), Thor summons lightning without Mjolnir. The office of Sorcerer Supreme leads a groups of sorcerers who protect the Earth from mystical threats (as defined in Dr. Strange). Wanda wields chaos magic and can “re-write reality at will”, which is completely magical in nature (witchcraft and not sorcery, as we learn). I think you’re leaning on Thor’s original explanation from his first film that he comes from a place “where they are one and the same,” and, while we may be able to argue that about Asgard (though I would push back on that argument), it’s been shown to not apply elsewhere in the MCU. To the contrary, I see the juxtaposition of magic and science as a sort of fascinating throughline that is being played out in recent films.

Expand full comment
Jen Sopchockchai Bankard's avatar

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this, Dave! You are so right -- I was really just thinking of that one line Thor has in his first film: “Your ancestors called it magic but you call it science. I come from a land where they are one and the same.” And the Tesseract presents as technology more than a magical artifact. But in terms of the wider MCU, yes, I concede your point about magic and sorcery. Apologies for being so tunnel-visioned. This is making me realize you could probably right a whole book just on this topic!

Expand full comment
Jen Sopchockchai Bankard's avatar

Edit: *write a whole book

Expand full comment